Reading Comprehension
Verbal Ability

 Back to Questions

Common Information

The classical realist theory of international relations has long dominated both academic institutions and the American government. Even at the birth of the nation, early political thinkers, such as Alexander Hamilton, promoted a realist view of international relations and sought to influence the actions of the government based on this perspective. While the classical realist school of international relations is not entirely homogeneous in nature, there are certain premises that all classical realists share. 

The primary principle underlying classical realism is a concern with issues of war and peace. Specifically, classical realists ask, what are the causes of war and what are the conditions of peace? The members of the classical realist school mainly attribute war and conflict to what is termed the security dilemma. In the absence of any prevailing global authority, each nation is required to address its own security needs. However, each nation’s quest for security—through military buildups, alliances, or territorial defenses—necessarily unsettles other nations. These nations react to feelings of insecurity by engaging in their own aggressive actions, which leads other nations to react similarly, perpetuating the cycle.

It is important to note that for realists, unlike idealists or liberal internationalists, international conflict is a necessary consequence of the structural anarchy that nations find themselves in. Whereas other schools may see international conflict as the result of evil dictators, historical chance, flawed socio political systems, or ignorance of world affairs, classical realists see war as the logical result of a system that by its nature lacks a true central authority.

Hand in hand with this view of conflict as an inevitable condition of the global power structure is the realists’ view of the nation as a unitary actor. Because classical realists see international relations as a continuing struggle for dominance, the nation can not be viewed as a collection of individuals with disparate wants, goals, and ideologies. The realist view requires the formulation of a national interest, which in its simplest terms refers to the nation’s ability to survive, maintain its security, and achieve some level of power relative to its competitors.

Realism is not without its critics, many of whom challenge the premise that war is the natural condition of international relations or that there can be a truly national interest. However, the realist school of international relations continues to shape foreign policy because of the successes it has had in describing real world interactions between nations.


Common Information Question: 2/4

Which of the following, if true, would best support the classical realist theory of international conflict as it is described in the passage?


Some countries ruled by dictators maintain peaceful relations with their neighbors


Despite the presence of a world superpower, many countries continue to fight wars with their neighbors.


War has existed from the beginning of recorded history.


After the nations of the world form an authoritative world court, wars decrease dramatically.


Some countries are able to capture territories from other countries without fear of international consequences.

 Hide Ans

Option(D) is correct

This is an apply information question. In order to answer it, you must first go to the passage to understand the theory of conflict. This information is found in the second paragraph: "In the absence of any prevailing global authority, each nation is required to address its own security needs." Next, you have to figure out which choice best supports this view.

Choice A doesn’t do much. The classical realist school isn’t concerned with the actions of dictators.

Choice B seems to hurt the theory. It states that there is a prevailing global authority and yet conflict continues.

Choice C just states that war is a persistent problem, but it doesn’t address the causes of it, so this choice doesn’t necessarily support the theory.

Choice D does support the theory because it shows that the presence of a global authority reduces war. Remember, the realist view argued that the lack of a global authority led to war, so the presence of a global authority should reduce war. That is what choice D states.

Choice E doesn’t address the causes of war or the presence of a global authority.

(0) Comment(s)